http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hain-1918bis-00.txt
A new draft requesting expansion of RFC 1918 space by adding 3 /8s to space reserved for private use. Given the presented justification (see introduction): "Given the policies for acquiring additional public space it is not reasonable for them to acquire such space for use in their private networks. " I am left a bit confused about the statement and would like to have the wg request the RIPE NCC to ask the author for further clarification Regards, Joao Damas
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 10:45:46AM +0200, Joao Damas wrote:
A new draft requesting expansion of RFC 1918 space by adding 3 /8s to space reserved for private use.
Given the presented justification (see introduction):
"Given the policies for acquiring additional public space it is not reasonable for them to acquire such space for use in their private networks. "
Hi João, my reading is "acording to policy, the request would fail the 'can private space be used' check". However, I also read a "making request for private networks is such an hassle" subtext which might be due to my lack of English skills, the author's lack of English skills, or both :) Either way, it seems like a rather poor draft on the whole and doesn't seem to have been particularly though through. Regards -- Carlos Morgado <chbm@cprm.net> - Internet Engineering - Phone +351 214146594 GPG key: 0x75E451E2 FP: B98B 222B F276 18C0 266B 599D 93A1 A3FB 75E4 51E2 The views expressed above do not bind my employer.
participants (2)
-
Carlos Morgado -
Joao Damas