2008-05 Revised/New Discussion Phase set (Anycasting Assignments for TLD's and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
PDP Number: 2008-05 Anycasting Assignments for TLD's and Tier 0/1 ENUM Dear Colleagues, The text of the policy proposal 2008-05 has been revised based on the community feedback received on the mailing list and during RIPE 57. We have published the new version (version 2) today. As a result a new Discussion Phase is set for the proposal. You can find the full proposal at: http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2008-05.html We encourage you to review this policy proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 5 January 2009. Regards, Ana Matic RIPE NCC Asst. Policy Development Officer
Greetings! I support this proposal. Usually I do not like making special cases and introducing any inequality. But I understand that gTLD, ccTLD and ENUM tier 0/1 deserves some kind of special treatment. And I think we would be against ourselves blocking TLD and ENUM tier 0/1 operators from making their service more resilient and secure. Best regards, Tomas Hlavacek Ana Matic wrote:
PDP Number: 2008-05 Anycasting Assignments for TLD's and Tier 0/1 ENUM
Dear Colleagues,
The text of the policy proposal 2008-05 has been revised based on the community feedback received on the mailing list and during RIPE 57.
We have published the new version (version 2) today. As a result a new Discussion Phase is set for the proposal.
You can find the full proposal at:
http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2008-05.html
We encourage you to review this policy proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 5 January 2009.
Regards,
Ana Matic RIPE NCC Asst. Policy Development Officer
-- Tomas Hlavacek <tomas.hlavacek@elfove.cz>
Hi, I'm happy to see the removal of an external reference in this policy proposal. The current policy refers to the 'IANA Administrative Procedure for Root Zone Name Server Delegation and Glue Data'. It's possible that a change to that document could have a knock-on effect on RIPE policy. As such, I'm glad to see a change to self-contained policy. Regards, Leo Vegoda
participants (3)
-
Ana Matic
-
Leo Vegoda
-
Tomas Hlavacek