2019-01 Review Phase (Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA")
Dear colleagues, Policy proposal 2019-01, "Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA"" is now in the Review Phase. This proposal aims to make it clear in the IPv4 Policy that the status "ASSIGNED PA" can also be used for assignments to an LIR's infrastructure. The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis to support the community’s discussion. You can find the full proposal and impact analysis at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-01 And the draft documents at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-01/draft As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four week Review Phase is to continue discussing the proposal, taking the impact analysis into consideration, and to review the full draft RIPE Policy Document. At the end of the Review Phase, the WG Chairs will determine whether the WG has reached rough consensus. It is therefore important to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input from the previous phase. We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft document and send any comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 9 April 2019. Kind regards, Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
Dear colleagues, After reading the Impact Analysis, i wish to express my support to 2019-01. Best Regards, Carlos Friaças On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, Marco Schmidt wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Policy proposal 2019-01, "Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA"" is now in the Review Phase.
This proposal aims to make it clear in the IPv4 Policy that the status "ASSIGNED PA" can also be used for assignments to an LIR's infrastructure.
The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis to support the community?s discussion. You can find the full proposal and impact analysis at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-01
And the draft documents at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-01/draft
As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four week Review Phase is to continue discussing the proposal, taking the impact analysis into consideration, and to review the full draft RIPE Policy Document.
At the end of the Review Phase, the WG Chairs will determine whether the WG has reached rough consensus. It is therefore important to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input from the previous phase.
We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft document and send any comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 9 April 2019.
Kind regards,
Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
Dear colleagues, This proposal makes sense to us. We support it. Best Regards. El lun, 11-03-2019 a las 16:25 +0000, Carlos Friaças via address-policy-wg escribió:
Dear colleagues,
After reading the Impact Analysis, i wish to express my support to 2019-01.
Best Regards, Carlos Friaças
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, Marco Schmidt wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Policy proposal 2019-01, "Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA"" is now in the Review Phase.
This proposal aims to make it clear in the IPv4 Policy that the status "ASSIGNED PA" can also be used for assignments to an LIR's infrastructure.
The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis to support the community?s discussion. You can find the full proposal and impact analysis at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-01
And the draft documents at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-01/draft
As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four week Review Phase is to continue discussing the proposal, taking the impact analysis into consideration, and to review the full draft RIPE Policy Document.
At the end of the Review Phase, the WG Chairs will determine whether the WG has reached rough consensus. It is therefore important to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input from the previous phase.
We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft document and send any comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 9 April 2019.
Kind regards,
Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
Dear all,
Policy proposal 2019-01, "Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA"" is now in the Review Phase.
This proposal aims to make it clear in the IPv4 Policy that the status "ASSIGNED PA" can also be used for assignments to an LIR's infrastructure.
As this reflects both the original intent and current practice, I support the proposal. Best regards, Janos
Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer
On 11.03.2019 18:34, Janos Zsako wrote:
Dear all,
Policy proposal 2019-01, "Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA"" is now in the Review Phase.
This proposal aims to make it clear in the IPv4 Policy that the status "ASSIGNED PA" can also be used for assignments to an LIR's infrastructure.
As this reflects both the original intent and current practice, I support the proposal.
Best regards, Janos
+1
On 11/03/2019 12:37, Marco Schmidt wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Policy proposal 2019-01, "Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA"" is now in the Review Phase.
This proposal is just updating the documentation to better confirm what the intent - and actual application - of the policy is. This is a Good Thing. I support it. Paul.
I support this proposal. I see nothing bad with it and it only clarifies things. - Cynthia On 2019-03-11 13:37, Marco Schmidt wrote:
Policy proposal 2019-01, "Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA"" is now in the Review Phase.
Dear All, Sounds good. I support it. 11.03.19 14:37, Marco Schmidt пише:
Dear colleagues,
Policy proposal 2019-01, "Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA"" is now in the Review Phase.
This proposal aims to make it clear in the IPv4 Policy that the status "ASSIGNED PA" can also be used for assignments to an LIR's infrastructure.
The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis to support the community’s discussion. You can find the full proposal and impact analysis at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-01
And the draft documents at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-01/draft
As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four week Review Phase is to continue discussing the proposal, taking the impact analysis into consideration, and to review the full draft RIPE Policy Document.
At the end of the Review Phase, the WG Chairs will determine whether the WG has reached rough consensus. It is therefore important to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input from the previous phase.
We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft document and send any comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 9 April 2019.
Kind regards,
Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
+1 Support the proposal. -- cdh@globalconnect.dk Globalconnect A/S | Hørskætten 3 | DK-2630 Taastrup https://www.globalconnect.dk | https://nianet.dk On 11/03/2019 13:37, Marco Schmidt wrote:
Policy proposal 2019-01, "Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA"" is now in the Review Phase.
+1 Hervé CLEMENT -----Message d'origine----- De : address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net] De la part de Christoffer Hansen Envoyé : lundi 11 mars 2019 21:31 À : address-policy-wg@ripe.net Objet : Re: [address-policy-wg] 2019-01 Review Phase (Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA") +1 Support the proposal. -- cdh@globalconnect.dk Globalconnect A/S | Hørskætten 3 | DK-2630 Taastrup https://www.globalconnect.dk | https://nianet.dk On 11/03/2019 13:37, Marco Schmidt wrote:
Policy proposal 2019-01, "Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA"" is now in the Review Phase.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
Support here too. -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
* Marco Schmidt
Policy proposal 2019-01, "Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA"" is now in the Review Phase.
Supported. Tore
* Marco Schmidt <mschmidt@ripe.net> [2019-03-11 13:38]:
Dear colleagues,
Policy proposal 2019-01, "Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA"" is now in the Review Phase.
I support this. Regards Sebastian -- GPG Key: 0x58A2D94A93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE) 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE. -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant
Dear AP WG; On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 01:37:47PM +0100, Marco Schmidt wrote:
Policy proposal 2019-01, "Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA"" is now in the Review Phase. [..] We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft document and send any comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 9 April 2019.
Review phase is now over. A number of you have expressed support for the proposal. Nobody voiced any opposing arguments, had any questions, or did post anything else under this subject line which was not clear support. Thus, I declare we have consensus, and have asked Marco to move this proposal to "Last Call". Thanks for your contributions, Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
participants (14)
-
Carlos Friaças -
Christoffer Hansen -
Cynthia Revström -
Francis Brosnan Blázquez -
Gert Doering -
herve.clement＠orange.com -
Janos Zsako -
Marco Schmidt -
Max Tulyev -
Paul Thornton -
Radu Anghel -
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN -
Sebastian Wiesinger -
Tore Anderson