Re: [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
* Emilio Madaio:
I oppose this policy. IXPs shouldn't be special-cased. The assumption of a single peering LAN per organization does not seem to match the requirements of the industry. It is odd that preexisting PI space must be returned, but not existing PA space. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
* fweimer@bfk.de (Florian Weimer) [Wed 26 Oct 2011, 15:43 CEST]:
* Emilio Madaio:
I oppose this policy. IXPs shouldn't be special-cased. The assumption of a single peering LAN per organization does not seem to match the requirements of the industry. It is odd that preexisting PI space must be returned, but not existing PA space.
I assume PA space will just remain allocated but not assigned, i.e. falls under the LIR's assignment window requirements again. -- Niels.
participants (2)
-
Florian Weimer -
niels=apwg＠bakker.net