Hi,

Dear Colleagues,

The text of RIPE Policy Proposal 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation", has been revised based on the community feedback received on the mailing list. We have published the new version (version 2.0) today. As a result, a new Discussion Phase is set for the proposal.

Highlights of the changes in version 2.0 are:

- The proposed new section 5.1.2 was reworded - Section 5.7 was not removed but it was reworded

You can find the full proposal at:

http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-04

We encourage you to review this policy proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 30 January 2012.

looks basically fine to me - the new version doesn't change anything i liked about the initial one. Although maybe.. "Organisations that meet the initial allocation criteria are eligible to receive an initial allocation of /32. For allocations up to /29 no additional documentation is necessary." ... is a little vague for people who haven't followed the discussion here ("why no /29 per default in the first place?"). I don't see a general problem with that wording and have no better idea, just saying that some might be confused about what's the point here when reading the updated policy later. Or maybe it's just me _because_ i followed the discussion :-) -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind Regards Sascha Lenz [SLZ-RIPE] Senior System- & Network Architect