hi My 2 cents. If there is person or company need ip and network in the region, so ripe Ncc will provide. Simple. I trust ripe Ncc is smart enough to avoid any political bs. This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this message and including the text of the transmission received.

On 2014年7月29日, at 下午6:00, address-policy-wg-request@ripe.net wrote:

Send address-policy-wg mailing list submissions to address-policy-wg@ripe.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to address-policy-wg-request@ripe.net

You can reach the person managing the list at address-policy-wg-owner@ripe.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of address-policy-wg digest..."

Today's Topics:

1. Re: [ncc-services-wg] Crimea papers (Jo?o Damas)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 11:54:22 +0200 From: Jo?o Damas <joao@bondis.org> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] [ncc-services-wg] Crimea papers To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Cc: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, address-policy-wg@ripe.net Message-ID: <7C28157D-633E-45BC-8855-4B3864CC436A@bondis.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

...

On 29 Jul 2014, at 11:35, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:

...

On 29 Jul 2014, at 10:21, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:

Please take your fight and accusations elsewhere. It does not have anything to do with the address policy working group.

+1000000

RIPE and the NCC should keep well out of these political matters.

Away from the political aspects: indeed! This is not the place where these things can be solved.

Away from the legal aspects, quite possibly not. There is a requirement to provide legal papers and it would be good for the RIPE NCC to seek advice on the matter without making judgement calls. I don?t think anyone wants a repeat of previous sub-optimal handling of legal and law enforcement requests by the RIPE NCC. It?s better to be on solid ground and it shouldn?t be hard to ask for legal review.

Joao