Re: [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Regarding using last /8 for PI assignments, this proposal looks fair to me. -- Sergey Monday, May 7, 2012, 4:18:52 PM, you wrote: EM> Dear Colleagues, EM> A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-530, "IPv4 Address Allocation EM> and Assignment Policy for the RIPE NCC Service Region", is now EM> available for discussion. EM> You can find the full proposal at: EM> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-04 EM> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to EM> <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 4 June 2012. EM> Regards EM> Emilio Madaio EM> Policy Development Officer EM> RIPE NCC
On 5/7/12 4:27 PM, Sergey Myasoedov wrote:
Regarding using last /8 for PI assignments, this proposal looks fair to me.
Agree. Lets distribute the leftovers and be done with this for good, so people could focus on important things (such as IPv6 deployment :) ) +1 Jan
On 7 May 2012, at 16:58, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote:
On 5/7/12 4:27 PM, Sergey Myasoedov wrote:
Regarding using last /8 for PI assignments, this proposal looks fair to me.
Agree. Lets distribute the leftovers and be done with this for good, so people could focus on important things (such as IPv6 deployment :) )
+1 At the current run-rate, how long would PI from the final /8 be available ? Is it considered desirable by the community to any space whatsoever of the final /8 for PA, so that new LIRs can form and be given any v4 for a period of time longer than the anticipated run rate ? My mind is not made up on the subject yet, though I am erring on the side of 'no' because after some consideration, I think that v6 is the only long-term answer, and that stalling tactics are all very interesting to discuss. Andy
participants (3)
-
Andy Davidson -
Jan Zorz ＠ go6.si -
Sergey Myasoedov