Hi, Myself Pooran Mittal, member of APNIC [IMCL-IN] with AS 17665. How RIPE can help me to get IPV4 addresses. Please help me. Regards Pooran Mittal ----- Original Message ----- From: <address-policy-wg-request@ripe.net> To: <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 3:30 PM Subject: address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 14, Issue 4

Send address-policy-wg mailing list submissions to address-policy-wg@ripe.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to address-policy-wg-request@ripe.net

You can reach the person managing the list at address-policy-wg-owner@ripe.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of address-policy-wg digest..."

Today's Topics:

1. Re: Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8 (Jan Zorz @ go6.si) 2. Re: Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8 (Sander Steffann) 3. Re: [Ticket#2012092701011684] Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses (James Blessing) 4. Re: Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8 (Richard Hartmann) 5. 2012-06 Draft Document and Impact Analysis will be produced (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion) (Emilio Madaio)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1 Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 14:20:58 +0200 From: "Jan Zorz @ go6.si" <jan@go6.si> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8 To: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Message-ID: <506C2DAA.3040509@go6.si> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

On 10/3/12 1:41 PM, Gert Doering wrote:

...

Hi,

On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 12:55:53PM +0200, Marcin Kuczera wrote:

...

I'am lost a little bit, what is the current status of policy, that would allow single /24 PI IPv4 assignment from the last /8 ???

"Too controversial to go forward".

It is a "yes" or "no" question, afaik :)

Cheers, Jan

------------------------------

Message: 2 Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 15:17:43 +0200 From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8 To: Marcin Kuczera <marcin@leon.pl> Cc: "address-policy-wg@ripe.net" <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> Message-ID: <A3853826-7A62-4EE4-94D6-EBF1A6F5AE88@steffann.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Hello Marcin,

...

I'am lost a little bit, what is the current status of policy, that would allow single /24 PI IPv4 assignment from the last /8 ???

You can find the status here: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-04 The policy proposal is in the review phase and under discussion until the 8th of October.

Sander Steffann APWG co-chair

------------------------------

Message: 3 Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 17:01:50 +0100 From: James Blessing <james.blessing@despres.co.uk> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses To: Address Policy Working Group <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> Message-ID: <CAL5RSTKfm-c1O2k3q9jC01u_YK9-Az_7tfTW9DAFpzY04p9xVQ@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 3 October 2012 15:21, LeaderTelecom B.V. <info@leadertelecom.nl> wrote:

...

You can sub-allocate up to a /20 every twelve months to a single downstream Internet Service Provider (ISP). The minimum sub-allocation size is a /24. This is the smallest prefix length that can be reverse delegated and that allows for a reasonable number of small assignments to be made by a downstream network operator.

Okay

So wouldn't the best change be to allow up to allocation window per annum plus an ability to go via the RIPE NCC for further sub-allocations?

J --

James Blessing 07989 039 476

------------------------------

Message: 4 Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 23:15:35 +0200 From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8 To: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Cc: Marcin Kuczera <marcin@leon.pl>, address-policy-wg@ripe.net Message-ID: <CAD77+gRkADX31OdFWdT_bt6kwPSo3ZyzNtvAbT-y=75E3Dbg1A@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I can't inline my replies on Android, sorry.

The official status page is of limited use in this context, but the official date/timeline _is_ good to be reminded of; thanks.

PS: I didn't attend and simply stole the 66 from Nick ;)

Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.