2012-05 Proposal Accepted (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
Dear Colleagues, Consensus has been reached, and the proposal for a change to RIPE Document ripe-553, "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region", has been accepted by the RIPE community. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-05 The updated RIPE document is ripe-577 and is available at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-577 Thank you for your input. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
Hi, On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 03:55:30PM +0100, Emilio Madaio wrote:
The updated RIPE document is ripe-577 and is available at:
ripe-577 contains, in S5.5 the sentence: "Re-allocated blocks will be signed to establish the current allocation owner." What does this refer to? Does this mean these blocks will *mandatorily* be signed with a RPKI certificate and, if yes, how does that square with the NCC's stated policy that RPKI certs will always be voluntary? Regards, Sascha Luck
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Sascha Luck <lists-ripe@c4inet.net> wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 03:55:30PM +0100, Emilio Madaio wrote:
The updated RIPE document is ripe-577 and is available at:
ripe-577 contains, in S5.5 the sentence:
"Re-allocated blocks will be signed to establish the current allocation owner."
What does this refer to? Does this mean these blocks will *mandatorily* be signed with a RPKI certificate and, if yes, how does that square with the NCC's stated policy that RPKI certs will always be voluntary?
I really hope that's a type or forgotten connection somehow. -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger@jorgensen.no
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 08:51:44PM +0100, Roger J?rgensen wrote:
I really hope that's a type or forgotten connection somehow.
That's quite possible, it came in in 2007 and pre-dates the rpki roll-out... cheers, Sascha
participants (3)
-
Emilio Madaio -
Roger Jørgensen -
Sascha Luck