2023-02 Review Phase (Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments)
Dear colleagues, Policy proposal 2023-02, "Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments", is now in the Review Phase. This policy proposal recommends setting the minimum assignment size for IPv4 temporary assignments to a /24,while still allowing for a smaller assignment if requested by the End User. This policy proposal also allows routing requirements to justify the request for more than a /24 for research purposes. The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis on this proposal to support the community’s discussion. You can find the proposal and impact analysis at: _https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02_ _https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02#impact-analysis_ And the draft documents at: _https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02/draft_ As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four-week Review Phase is to continue discussion of the proposal taking the impact analysis into consideration, and to review the full draft RIPE Policy Document. At the end of the Review Phase, the Working Group (WG) Chairs will determine whether the WG has reached rough consensus. It is therefore important to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input from the previous phase. We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft document and to send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 2 May 2023. Kind regards, Angela Dall'Ara Policy Officer RIPE NCC
On 03/04/2023 18:03, Angela Dall'Ara wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Policy proposal 2023-02, "Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments", is now in the Review Phase.
It is therefore important to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input from the previous phase.
I support the proposal.
Hi, On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 10:03:44AM +0100, Angela Dall'Ara wrote:
Policy proposal 2023-02, "Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments", is now in the Review Phase.
I still support the proposed change. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
I support the policy proposal. However, I would prefer to see the second paragraph of the proposed article 3.3 reworded. Currently it's just one really long sentence and it was a bit difficult for me to read. I'm pretty sure that I got the point but I think it should be improved and disambiguated a bit. -Cynthia On Mon, 3 Apr 2023, 11:04 Angela Dall'Ara, <adallara@ripe.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Policy proposal 2023-02, "Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments", is now in the Review Phase.
This policy proposal recommends setting the minimum assignment size for IPv4 temporary assignments to a /24, while still allowing for a smaller assignment if requested by the End User. This policy proposal also allows routing requirements to justify the request for more than a /24 for research purposes.
The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis on this proposal to support the community’s discussion.
You can find the proposal and impact analysis at:
*https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02 <https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02>*
*https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02#impact-analysis <https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02#impact-analysis>*
And the draft documents at:
*https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02/draft <https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02/draft>*
As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four-week Review Phase is to continue discussion of the proposal taking the impact analysis into consideration, and to review the full draft RIPE Policy Document.
At the end of the Review Phase, the Working Group (WG) Chairs will determine whether the WG has reached rough consensus.
It is therefore important to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input from the previous phase.
We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft document and to send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 2 May 2023.
Kind regards,
Angela Dall'Ara
Policy Officer
RIPE NCC
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
Hi, I also support this proposal, after reading the NCC's impact analysis. I was a bit surprised to see there is a /13 reserved for temporary assignments, and only a /15 for IXPs (just read also 2023-01...). I would also like to add a +1 to what Cynthia wrote, even if this will require a version 2.0 of this proposal. Regards, Carlos On Tue, 11 Apr 2023, Cynthia Revström via address-policy-wg wrote:
I support the policy proposal. However, I would prefer to see the second paragraph of the proposed article 3.3 reworded. Currently it's just one really long sentence and it was a bit difficult for me to read. I'm pretty sure that I got the point but I think it should be improved and disambiguated a bit.
-Cynthia
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023, 11:04 Angela Dall'Ara, <adallara@ripe.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Policy proposal 2023-02, "Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments", is now in the Review Phase.
This policy proposal recommends setting the minimum assignment size for IPv4 temporary assignments to a /24, while still allowing for a smaller assignment if requested by the End User. This policy proposal also allows routing requirements to justify the request for more than a /24 for research purposes.
The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis on this proposal to support the community?s discussion.
You can find the proposal and impact analysis at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02#impact-analysis
And the draft documents at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02/draft
As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four-week Review Phase is to continue discussion of the proposal taking the impact analysis into consideration, and to review the full draft RIPE Policy Document.
At the end of the Review Phase, the Working Group (WG) Chairs will determine whether the WG has reached rough consensus.
It is therefore important to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input from the previous phase.
We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft document and to send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 2 May 2023.
Kind regards,
Angela Dall'Ara
Policy Officer
RIPE NCC
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
participants (5)
-
Angela Dall'Ara -
Carlos Friaças -
Cynthia Revström -
Gert Doering -
Massimo Candela