2012-09 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments)
Dear Colleagues, The draft document for the proposal described in 2012-09, "Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments", has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-09 and the draft document at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-09/draft We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 25 February 2013. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Emilio Madaio <emadaio@ripe.net> wrote:
We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 25 February 2013.
Support. -- Richard
Dear AP WG, in the discussion phase, strong support was expressed for this proposal (and I'm happy to see such strong participation, as it makes Sander's and my life as chairs much easier). Unfortunately, participation in the current phase (review) has been a bit sparse so far - one voice in support, nothing else. We need a few more voices to comfortably decide "the community supports this proposal". The review phase ends on February 25, so please voice your opinion before that (otherwise we'll have to extend it...) thanks, Gert Doering, APWG Chair On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 02:11:23PM +0100, Emilio Madaio wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
The draft document for the proposal described in 2012-09, "Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments", has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published
You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-09
and the draft document at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-09/draft
We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 25 February 2013.
Regards
Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
* Gert Doering
in the discussion phase, strong support was expressed for this proposal (and I'm happy to see such strong participation, as it makes Sander's and my life as chairs much easier).
Unfortunately, participation in the current phase (review) has been a bit sparse so far - one voice in support, nothing else. We need a few more voices to comfortably decide "the community supports this proposal".
I wasn't aware that I had to repeat my statement of support for it to still count, but in any case - consider it done. -- Tore Anderson
On 20/02/2013 22:46, Tore Anderson wrote:
I wasn't aware that I had to repeat my statement of support for it to still count, but in any case - consider it done.
It's an oddity of the PDP. I'm not sure if it serves a useful purpose because at the times when there are piles of proposals flying around (e.g. now), people end up getting jaded by the requirement for constant acks and me-toos. Nick
On 2/20/13 23:50 , "Nick Hilliard" <nick@inex.ie> wrote:
It's an oddity of the PDP. I'm not sure if it serves a useful purpose because at the times when there are piles of proposals flying around (e.g. now), people end up getting jaded by the requirement for constant acks and me-toos.
+1, and yes, I again support this proposal. Remco van Mook Director of Interconnection, EMEA EQUINIX | 80 Cheapside, London, EC2V 6EE, United Kingdom E remco@equinix.com | T +31-6-11356365 HOW ARE WE DOING? <http://www.customersat3.com/csc/equinix> Please click here to Tell Equinix - We're Listening Equinix.co.uk <http://www.equinix.co.uk/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/equinix> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/company/equinix> | Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/Equinix> | YouTube <http://www.youtube.com/user/equinixvideos> This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately. Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office: Quadrant House, 4 Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW. Registered in England and Wales, No. 6293383.
Hi, On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:50:41PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 20/02/2013 22:46, Tore Anderson wrote:
I wasn't aware that I had to repeat my statement of support for it to still count, but in any case - consider it done.
It's an oddity of the PDP. I'm not sure if it serves a useful purpose because at the times when there are piles of proposals flying around (e.g. now), people end up getting jaded by the requirement for constant acks and me-toos.
Yeah, the PDP is a bit heavy on "make sure that there is enough backing of the community, so nobody sneaks through anything while people are not looking". The need for extra input in the review phase is due to the fact that the proposal text might change between discussion and review phase, and also due to the impact analysis, which might change someone's opinion. Now, for 2012-09 and 2012-10, these are somewhat unusual - overwhelming support in discussion phase, no textual changes going to review phase, and an impact analysis that basically says "no impact" - so I can see that it feels a bit silly to have to re-state support again. But thanks anyway :-) Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
On 2/20/13 11:50 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 20/02/2013 22:46, Tore Anderson wrote:
I wasn't aware that I had to repeat my statement of support for it to still count, but in any case - consider it done.
It's an oddity of the PDP. I'm not sure if it serves a useful purpose because at the times when there are piles of proposals flying around (e.g. now), people end up getting jaded by the requirement for constant acks and me-toos.
Agree... is this painful enough that we need to change it? Cheers, Jan
Hi, On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:29:09PM +0100, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote:
On 2/20/13 11:50 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 20/02/2013 22:46, Tore Anderson wrote:
I wasn't aware that I had to repeat my statement of support for it to still count, but in any case - consider it done.
It's an oddity of the PDP. I'm not sure if it serves a useful purpose because at the times when there are piles of proposals flying around (e.g. now), people end up getting jaded by the requirement for constant acks and me-toos.
Agree... is this painful enough that we need to change it?
See my other e-mail on this topic - it serves a purpose, as the proposal might have changed significantly when entering review phase, or the impact analysis might have turned up some "unintended consequences". Plus, usually there is not so strong "yes, make it happen, now!" support in the discussion phase, but more of an actual *discussion* :-) These two proposals (2012-09 and 2012-10) are untypical. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
On 2/20/13 11:46 PM, Tore Anderson wrote:
Unfortunately, participation in the current phase (review) has been a bit sparse so far - one voice in support, nothing else. We need a few more voices to comfortably decide "the community supports this proposal".
I wasn't aware that I had to repeat my statement of support for it to still count, but in any case - consider it done.
The same as for 2012-10... need to re-state the support in Review phase, even though many of folx stated it in Discussion phase. This procedure is not the best one possible, people usually are not very happy doing the same thing twice. Cheers, Jan
Ah, yes. I do support this proposal. Even in the review phase ;-) Best regards, Paul Hoogsteder - who won't be able to attend RIPE Dublin :-(
Dear AP WG,
in the discussion phase, strong support was expressed for this proposal (and I'm happy to see such strong participation, as it makes Sander's and my life as chairs much easier).
Unfortunately, participation in the current phase (review) has been a bit sparse so far - one voice in support, nothing else. We need a few more voices to comfortably decide "the community supports this proposal".
The review phase ends on February 25, so please voice your opinion before that (otherwise we'll have to extend it...)
thanks,
Gert Doering, APWG Chair
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 02:11:23PM +0100, Emilio Madaio wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
The draft document for the proposal described in 2012-09, "Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments", has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published
You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-09
and the draft document at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-09/draft
We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 25 February 2013.
Regards
Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
I support thisŠ :) /Ragnar On 20.02.13 20:03, "Gert Doering" <gert@space.net> wrote:
Dear AP WG,
in the discussion phase, strong support was expressed for this proposal (and I'm happy to see such strong participation, as it makes Sander's and my life as chairs much easier).
Unfortunately, participation in the current phase (review) has been a bit sparse so far - one voice in support, nothing else. We need a few more voices to comfortably decide "the community supports this proposal".
The review phase ends on February 25, so please voice your opinion before that (otherwise we'll have to extend it...)
thanks,
Gert Doering, APWG Chair
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 02:11:23PM +0100, Emilio Madaio wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
The draft document for the proposal described in 2012-09, "Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments", has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published
You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-09
and the draft document at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-09/draft
We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 25 February 2013.
Regards
Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
I support this proposal. Erik Bais
*sigh* - support - (Outlook-style full-quoting intentionally to annoy the chairs) -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind Regards Sascha Lenz [SLZ-RIPE] Senior System- & Network Architect Am 20.02.2013 um 20:03 schrieb Gert Doering <gert@space.net>:
Dear AP WG,
in the discussion phase, strong support was expressed for this proposal (and I'm happy to see such strong participation, as it makes Sander's and my life as chairs much easier).
Unfortunately, participation in the current phase (review) has been a bit sparse so far - one voice in support, nothing else. We need a few more voices to comfortably decide "the community supports this proposal".
The review phase ends on February 25, so please voice your opinion before that (otherwise we'll have to extend it...)
thanks,
Gert Doering, APWG Chair
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 02:11:23PM +0100, Emilio Madaio wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
The draft document for the proposal described in 2012-09, "Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments", has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published
You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-09
and the draft document at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-09/draft
We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 25 February 2013.
Regards
Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
+1,Support -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Hamed Shafaghi I I Managing Director I I Skydsl® Telecom I hamed@skydsl.ir I www.skydsl.ir I
Am 20.02.13 20:03 schrieb "Gert Doering" unter <gert@space.net>:
Dear AP WG,
in the discussion phase, strong support was expressed for this proposal (and I'm happy to see such strong participation, as it makes Sander's and my life as chairs much easier).
Unfortunately, participation in the current phase (review) has been a bit sparse so far - one voice in support, nothing else. We need a few more voices to comfortably decide "the community supports this proposal".
+1 support
Gert Doering said:
We need a few more voices to comfortably decide that "the community supports this proposal".
+1 support D. -- Donal Cunningham IP Network Engineer, AirSpeed Telecom dcunningham@airspeed.ie | +353 1 428 7531
On 20/02/2013 19:03, Gert Doering wrote:
Dear AP WG,
in the discussion phase, strong support was expressed for this proposal (and I'm happy to see such strong participation, as it makes Sander's and my life as chairs much easier).
Unfortunately, participation in the current phase (review) has been a bit sparse so far - one voice in support, nothing else. We need a few more voices to comfortably decide "the community supports this proposal".
The review phase ends on February 25, so please voice your opinion before that (otherwise we'll have to extend it...)
Yes, please, +1 Nigel
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Dear AP WG,
in the discussion phase, strong support was expressed for this proposal (and I'm happy to see such strong participation, as it makes Sander's and my life as chairs much easier).
Unfortunately, participation in the current phase (review) has been a bit sparse so far - one voice in support, nothing else. We need a few more voices to comfortably decide "the community supports this proposal".
The review phase ends on February 25, so please voice your opinion before that (otherwise we'll have to extend it...)
supported. -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger@jorgensen.no
On 02/20/2013 08:03 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
in the discussion phase, strong support was expressed for this proposal (and I'm happy to see such strong participation, as it makes Sander's and my life as chairs much easier).
Unfortunately, participation in the current phase (review) has been a bit sparse so far - one voice in support, nothing else. We need a few more voices to comfortably decide "the community supports this proposal".
The review phase ends on February 25, so please voice your opinion before that (otherwise we'll have to extend it...)
I support policy 2012-09. -- Gerry
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 08:03:56PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
The review phase ends on February 25, so please voice your opinion before that (otherwise we'll have to extend it...)
Supported it in discussion, still supporting it in review. :) rgds, Sascha Luck
* Gert Doering <gert@space.net> [2013-02-20 20:06]:
Dear AP WG,
in the discussion phase, strong support was expressed for this proposal (and I'm happy to see such strong participation, as it makes Sander's and my life as chairs much easier).
Make it so! Regards Sebastian -- GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE) 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE. -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant
(still ;)) supporting it (policy 2012-09) Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Julian Seifert ________________________________________ Von: address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net [address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net]" im Auftrag von "Gert Doering [gert@space.net] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2013 20:03 An: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Betreff: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2012-09 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments) Dear AP WG, in the discussion phase, strong support was expressed for this proposal (and I'm happy to see such strong participation, as it makes Sander's and my life as chairs much easier). Unfortunately, participation in the current phase (review) has been a bit sparse so far - one voice in support, nothing else. We need a few more voices to comfortably decide "the community supports this proposal". The review phase ends on February 25, so please voice your opinion before that (otherwise we'll have to extend it...) thanks, Gert Doering, APWG Chair On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 02:11:23PM +0100, Emilio Madaio wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
The draft document for the proposal described in 2012-09, "Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments", has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published
You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-09
and the draft document at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-09/draft
We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 25 February 2013.
Regards
Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
participants (20)
-
Anfinsen, Ragnar -
Christoph Neukirch -
Donal Cunningham -
Emilio Madaio -
Erik Bais -
Gerry Demaret -
Gert Doering -
Hamed Shafaghi -
Jan Zorz ＠ go6.si -
Julian Seifert -
Nick Hilliard -
Nigel Titley -
Paul Hoogsteder -
Remco Van Mook -
Richard Hartmann -
Roger Jørgensen -
Sascha Lenz -
Sascha Luck -
Sebastian Wiesinger -
Tore Anderson