23 Feb
2006
23 Feb
'06
5:14 p.m.
Rene Wilhelm wrote:
Have either of you run the simulations with other HDR values? Would .97 make a significant difference?
I also did 0.966, the value proposed in the RIPE48 meeting (may 2004).
With an HD ratio of 0.966 the projected increase for the historic RIPE NCC allocations is 22% on 1/1/2006.
Thanks. Maybe I missed the point, but isn't the goal to define the HD ratio that is equivalent to the historical allocation rates? As I recall the .96 value was a rough fit from some simple calculations, so there is nothing that ties us to that. I realize it is probably a trial and error effort, but now that the models are built it should just be processing time to run through some numbers until the rate aligns. Tony