Marco Hogewoning wrote:
On 14 apr 2009, at 14:57, Ingrid Wijte wrote:
PDP Number: 2009-05 Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs
Dear Colleagues
A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for discussion. Summary of Proposal: This is a proposal to allow an LIR operating separate networks in unconnected geographical areas to receive multiple /32 IPv6 allocations.
This policy is a must-have policy for hundreds of thousand users in my county and more than 20 LIRs. However there is a strong limitation for me in this policy, because we are using at least two different policies but within ONE single geographical areas. The differences in routing policies are not because of different geographical areas but because of different kind of customers we are serving. Currently we have to divide single /32 into multiple pieces and announce them under different ASs we have, which weak but the only possible solution. We do not have any chance to get a second /32 from RIPE so far. It would be really helpful to reflect this real life situation in single policy like this one. So after removing the part about "different unconnected geographical areas" this policy will get strong support from LIRs I'm writing about. Best regards, Bartek Gajda