Michele,
The original proposal provided for enforcement. That
part was removed because it crosses into another area of responsibility.
However, if the proposal is adopted and then violated, another proposal could be
made providing for enforcement. At least that is my understanding of the
situation.
You might note that I made this proposal because our
security department was running into e-mail addresses that didn't work, were
missing or directed one to a web site. All of these results dramatically
increase the time required to report abuse of an IP address. If the
proposal is adopted, I think there will be a lot of people and organizations
interested in enforcement.
Regards,
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 19:50
Subject: Re: [policy-announce] 2006-04 New Policy Proposal (Contact
e-mail Address Requirements)
Jeff Scribner wrote:
> Michele,
>
> The
proposal as written should cover this. The requirement is for a
>
working e-mail address that will accept messages - not one that
will
> direct you to a web site.
>
>
Regards,
>
> Jeff
>
>
Jeff
that's fair enough, but what if the Ripe member ignores the
policy?
Is there any recourse?
Michele
--
http://www.mneylon.com/blog
http://www.irishwebmasterforum.com/
http://www.armchair.ie/