Am 21.10.2011 22:58, schrieb Jan Zorz @ go6.si:
We went through long discussion regarding this and this also needs a change of a policy, making one particular technology special.
The common voice from community was "please, don't make 6rd special, because we don't know what follows".
Hi, I think it's a good idea not making one particular technology special. Also we are not going for 6RD we are having other problems regarding a initial /32 instead of a /29. We got a /32 some years ago. Now we find ourselves in a situation where we are having a need for /29. We also can justifiy it and we would get an assignement if we would do an initial request now. Following the current policy we are having two choices. 1) Returning the /32 and getting a /29 (which does not include the former /32). For us this is no option. 2) Stick to policy for subsequent allocations. In our case this means additional unneccessary work. Anyway it ends in a /29 for us. I'm conviced a /29 will be very helpful for proper addressing plans and I'm strongly supporting this proposal.
Why not making IPv6 more easily deployable, without those restrictions from IPv4 and legacy thinking about maximum conservation?
ACK. cheers, Michael -- Michael Adams Tel: +49 221 2222 657 Network Engineering & Design Fax: +49 221 2222 7657 NetCologne Geschäftsführer Gesellschaft für Telekommunikation mbH Dr. Hans Konle (Sprecher) Am Coloneum 9 Dipl.-Ing. Karl-Heinz Zankel 50829 Köln HRB 25580, Amtsgericht Köln