One more argument. For example LIR has IPv4 185.100.104.0/22 and 185.100.116.0/22 (we talk that multi LIRs accounts don't abuse the system and LIR can have such IPs) But LIR's infrastructure needs to have /21. LIR can write to 185.100.108.0/22 owner and change his 185.100.116.0/22. But LIR has to wait for 24 months to do it if this proposal is approved. 29.06.2015, 23:17, "Vladimir Andreev" <vladimir@quick-soft.net>:
Really?
I don't see any references to that matter in the letter from Sander.
29.06.2015, 22:49, "Gert Doering" <gert@space.net>:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:45:43PM +0300, Petr Umelov wrote:
Excuse me, /13. But it is the same argument.<br />
Yes, it is, and it has been duly considered.
Please turn off HTML in mails to this list, and do not top quote.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-- With best regards, Vladimir Andreev General director, QuickSoft LLC Tel: +7 903 1750503
-- Kind regards, Petr Umelov