Nits: 1. Should be Internet Number Resources 2. IANA does not exist as an organization. ICANN performs the IANA functions under a contract with the US DoC. There is nothing to preclude any other organization to perform all or part of this function. Under the current circumstances that could be either as a subcontractor to ICANN under the current contract or as a separate contractor to the US DoC. Point 2 has some interesting scenarios if looked at in the long run. Ray
-----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Daniel Karrenberg Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 9:58 AM To: Hans Petter Holen Cc: Rob Blokzijl; address-policy-wg@ripe.net Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] WG Charter
On 11.08 20:47, Hans Petter Holen wrote:
The Address Policy WG develops policies relating to the management and registration of Internet resources (currently IPv4, IPv6 and AS Numbers) by the RIPE NCC and its LIRs within the RIPE NCC service region. It also co-ordinates policies with the other RIR communities and liaises with the IANA and ICANN on address policy issues. The Address Policy WG meets three times a year at RIPE meetings and has an open (publicly archived) mailing list. Anyone with an interest in Internet numbering issues is welcome to observe, participate and contribute to the WG.
Nit: IPv4 and IPv6 *addresses* or shorter "Internet addresses".
Suggestion: replace "Internet resources ....)" by "Internet addresses and routing idetifiers". One can always add other stuff if necessary.
Nit: mentioning IANA is sufficient, no need to mention ICANN.
Suggestion: replace "It also .... issues." with "The WG coordinates its work with the appropriate bodies of the other RIRs and the IANA."
Daniel