Hi,

you have my support for this policy change proposal.

While the current policy was/is working fine, the RIPE NCC has no tools to actually enforce and/or verify the multihoming of an AS Number once it is issued.

cheers,
elvis

On 05/05/14 12:58, Sander Steffann wrote:

Hi Johan,

Yes, apologies for voting in the wrong place.  Then again, isn't a fake vote the strongest sign of support?
I genuinely feel this proposal would strongly benefit the community, and it is one of those "why has this not been written before"-moments for me.

Thank you for your very useful message. While the common '+1' messages are useful to determine the difference between 'nobody cares enough to comment' and 'people think this is a useful proposal', actually having comments that show the reasons and/or feelings for supporting a proposal are much much more valuable.

Thanks for the welcome. I hope I can contribute.

You seem to have started well :)  Welcome!

Cheers,
Sander
APWG co-chair

	Elvis Daniel Velea Chief Business Analyst Email: elvis@V4Escrow.net US Phone: +1 (702) 475 5914 EU Phone: +3 (161) 458 1914
Recognised IPv4 Broker/Facilitator in:

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.Any other use of this email is strictly prohibited.

Elvis Daniel Velea

Chief Business Analyst