-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Shane Kerr wrote on 29/06/2011 21:04: [...]
My further understanding is that desire for PI is mostly for non-technical reasons. I don't think anything can make this motivation go away. Companies want it.
PI also has non-technical implications. In terms of the maintenance fee, accountability, etc. So far it has been a loophole letting you to get a chunk bigger that the minimum allocation size for a fixed Eur50 (+your friendly LIR overhead) per year. But hopefully this can be fixed outside this policy proposal. Andrei -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEUEARECAAYFAk4NtL0ACgkQljz5tZmtij/78ACglSCfJWLmlw+BXCSmnrLe7ElS QW0AmJsPEEld+8H1iM5Zo6rzIrDMZLw= =QzBb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----