Kurt and all, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2004-10-29, at 06.50, Jeff Williams wrote:
Thanks for your explanation. So I guess this means two different policies because Afnic in this case "requested" such?
No. RIPE members brought this to the address-policy WG that discussed this and agreed on it.
Interesting method of policy determination..
Why? This is how all address-policy is determined.
And there is the curx of the problem...
- - kurtis -
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1
iQA/AwUBQYHX9KarNKXTPFCVEQI/TwCgnxQ84L4OzisqnaMmfKmGjQ2GrvsAoJiG 1XV3UNYgYg7okusqfoa8vIdd =fY3J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!) "Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" - Pierre Abelard "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact Number: 214-244-4827