On 20/06/2013 14:29, Opteamax GmbH wrote:
On 20.06.2013 13:28, Carsten Schiefner wrote:
Andrea, all -
full ACK to both:
* Allow status change from LIRs' PI assignments to PA allocations
and to Tore's point:
* Omission of the minimum allocation size constraint
Full +1 from my side.
from ripe perspective the only difference I can see is the fact that PI is charged seperately. I clearly remember the (funny mentioned) words at last GM: "we are already trying hard to make a deficit, but obviously we failed again" ... so allowing new LIR to migrate there PI into PA could be at least a way to reduce the income ;)
I'm glad someone was listening :-) FWIW, and wearing my own personal hat (the grey-green waterproof one that I had to buy in Amsterdam one year to stop from drowning in the rain), I think this is a good idea. We're going to discuss it at the board meeting next week. Nigel