Le mardi 08 avril 2008 à 05:29 -0700, Leo Vegoda a écrit :
Hi Frederic,
On 08/04/2008 03:58, "Frederic" <frederic@placenet.org> wrote:
[...]
why is broken ? because Ripe do not implement relation between PI holder thru Database information.
Dead PI is like Dead Domain name.
This is a fairly good analogy. My understanding of domain names is that they are normally delegated according to a contract with a registry or registrar. If the contract ends the delegation is removed.
a simple procedure thru mail communication can force to have news about "may be Dead" block and take the good decision.
To force "Contractual Link with Ripe" for PI bloc is not the good way. To force Fees is not good too.
I pay small fees for the domains I have registered.
Is your opposition to this proposal based on the size of the fee or are you opposed to there being any fees at all?
1) first i talk about domain for the way to check if is still alive: you receive one mail, two.... before is deleting. and you pay where you want your domain, you have a lot of choice. Some domain are free and you have choice to use it (eu.org, .st, .nf....) About fees: When a real work is done , is normal to pay for is work. (and the amount is equal to the effort and time to made this work...). About: IANA -> RIPE NCC -> LIR -> PI recipient and may be IANA -> RIPE NCC -> PI recipient the probleme (and is a political problem) is to have choice. We support to have contractual link with the compagny that you decide for PI. request must be free (and free of tax ;). In our non profit company, we talk about Ipv6. and we "do not understand" why assignement are different that Ipv4. why is not possible when you have Ipv4-Pi to request right now Ipv6-PI. "do not understand" = we understand the process, the ripe policy etc... but we do not understand why Pa assignement are available, not PI. (the answer was : we must go to policy proposal mailing list of ripe ;) bst regards. Frederic
Regards,
Leo Vegoda