On Saturday, October 22, 2016, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> wrote:
Hi Arash,
> If old businesses depend on selling IPv4 address to new comers and now
> looking to put some more value on their old blocks, their strategy should
> not be supported by 2016-03.
I'm sorry, but it's doing the opposite: it will make sure that the remaining pool is not drained by traders, keeping it available for longer for new companies that need them. If the "cheap" pool for newcomers runs out and address transfers become the *only* source for addresses, guess what will happen to the prices.
I've heared this story over and over. Let's protect the pool, let's not waste it and now, after 4 years the pool is almost the same size. Again, what is our purpose here ? Where is the imagined abuse ? Bring up some actual statistics not fake scary scenarios.
CiprianĀ