3 Sep
2010
3 Sep
'10
6:41 p.m.
On 03/09/2010 17:15, Remco van Mook wrote:
Nick Hilliard wrote:
So the "assignment-size:" really means maximum assignment size rather than exact assignment size?
There's certainly nothing stopping you from doing that - however it'll leave you with some explaining to do by the time you want your next block, because the smaller sub-assignments might not be reflected in HD ratios.
I'm concerned that unless this is spelled out, it creates a hole for unsuspecting LIRs to fall into. Think of how much future LIR and IPRA frustration could be prevented by making a one-line note in the "Usage" section about what will happen if you mix-n-match your assignment sizes! Nick