Hi, On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 08:57:55PM +0100, Carlos Friaças wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019, Gert Doering wrote:
(...)
Now, regarding the "monitoring" bit - since we're all mostly well-behaved here, :-)))
describing the limitations and requirements upfront and only acting in cases where the NCC is informed about misuse works fairly well
In this specific case would you call the NCC "the police", or would you classify who informs the NCC as "the police"...? :-)
Neither. The NCC is the registry who gives out addresses under very specific conditions, and if these conditions are not met by the receiving side, the address assignment/allocation is automatically voided. This is a pure contractual thing. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279