pekkas@netcore.fi (Pekka Savola) wrote:
Would you - if I may ask - believe "such or even larger companies" to be eligible for an independently routable prefix at all, or, more clearly spoken, eligible for a slot int the global routing table?
They should never be in the global routing table.
You are a modest person. I feel the same about our "home network", btw.; but that's because I trust my transit providers and I know how to renumber, should the need arise.
Getting 200 real customers is one acceptable circumtance.
I believe the "200" poses a problem for most of the typical early adopters, who are not among the Tier 1 folks, but in Tiers 2 and 3 (if you think in tiered terms). And of course, that still doesn't solve the "crucial end site" problems, which anyway are not the issue in this thread. I favour v6 PI, but anybodies mileage may vary. Elmar. -- "Begehe nur nicht den Fehler, Meinung durch Sachverstand zu substituieren." (PLemken, <bu6o7e$e6v0p$2@ID-31.news.uni-berlin.de>) --------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---