On Thursday, October 20, 2016, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
If I would moderate the list I would remove people
let's not
Ok, I can be a hater too sometimes but I don't like it.
I lived under the communist time and I know how it is when a leader
says something wrong but he believes is right and a bunch of penguins just sit in the room and applause.
i assure you that this is not just from communist times. are you seeing what is going on in britain, the states, ...?
Yes, bullshit (I was told this is an acceptable word here) happens all over the world and we are bringing it here as well.
could you please set an example and pick one small issue in this document and discuss its pros and cons?
I oppose both policies. For 2015-04 it's obvious, a policy that is supposed to arrange my hair nicer would make me bold. You either do a cosmetic reorganisation or important changes which should never be added just like that, as some changes are minor and shouldn't be discussed (but in a different policy) As for 2016-03 I think we should set our goals right. Isn't everybody saying that IPv4 is dead for over 4 years already ? Isn't everybody saying that the only way forward is to IPv6 and exhausting RIPE's available pool sooner would help people move to IPv6 ? Let's discuss a single fact which should guide us towards properly improving policies. What do you people want ? To kill IPv4 or to make it more desirable, more valuable ? Let's first agree on this and after that we can set our foot in the right direction. Ciprian