On 16 apr 2009, at 16:23, Piotr Strzyzewski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 04:18:34PM +0200, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
On 16 apr 2009, at 10:11, Jerzy Pawlus wrote:
I think we can modify your idea slightly. Let's assign 10 'scoring units' for a second and subsequent /32 not fulfilling HD-Ratio. It will effectively move an LIR to a higher billing category.
Let's not do that, as it would simply reduce the whole policy to you get as much addresses as you can afford instead of you get the addresses you need. Skipping HD-ratio in favor of scoring units is bad, very bad.
Which is what we have right now. Setup new (another) LIR (money). Get allocation. Merge LIRs (or not). Which is: "you get as much address as you can afford".
In which case HD-ratio will apply, or at least I assume RIPE-301, 2.6 would equally apply to IPv6 as it does to IPv4. Groet, MarcoH (trimmed the CC a bit to avoid duplicates)