21 Oct
2011
21 Oct
'11
2:02 p.m.
On 21 October 2011 12:42, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
I'm not exactly sure how you're proposing to modify this? "Special case for 6rd only"?
Send a guidance note... "Dear IPRAs, The AP-WG believe that 6RD as discussed in RFC5969 is a valid reason to request more than a /32 in order to give end user networks a sensible level of address space but please make sure that requests above a /29 have followed the correct mathematical calculations. Love The AP-WG" ... this doesn't require a change to the policy (correct me if I'm wrong) and stops people just requesting a /29 without a challenge. J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476