The stance that I'm agreeing with is regarding publication of rejected transfers and rejected pre-approvals, so "publish, but anonymize rejected transfers/pre-approvals" is good with me.

OK, then, you are not disagreeing with the policy proposal, only with one aspect of it which I have agreed to change. I take it you also agree with Tore that the aggregate data can be published by RIPE-NN via request rather than through policy change?

Milton L. Mueller

Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies

Internet Governance Project

http://blog.internetgovernance.org