Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Proposal Accepted and Implemented?(Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)

* Gert Doering

(Funny that people didn't complain when we changed the IPv6 allocation policy to permit /35 holders to extend their existing allocation to a /32 "just by asking for it" - *that* was a retroactive change of policy...)

Indeed. Or when we allowed transfers in the first place. Or when we allowed LIRs to make end-user assignments without filling in forms. Or when we further extended the /32 to /29 to accomodate for 6RD. Or when we allowed people to register any number of end-user assignments as a single AGGREGATED-BY-LIR object. Or... Tore