On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 23:50 +0100, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote:
On 2/15/12 10:43 PM, Tiberiu Ungureanu wrote:
Ok, I feel this is troll-feeding, but I'll bite: From what you say, I understand that you are dissatisfied with the "_additional_ allocation" policy. Why are you trying to change the "_initial_ allocation" policy then? If there's a problem with additional allocation policy, fix that, don't break this one.
Hi,
I don't really understand this comment.
Reading the comments on the list I feel I was misunderstood, so here is an attempt to clarify my position: I do NOT oppose 2011-04, on the contrary. I fully support initial allocation of /29. In the subsequent emails on this list, there were voices that said "those who already got /32, under the new policy can only get up to /29 and need to use the hd-ratio policy to get more, while the ones that don't already have ipv6 space have an easier task to get more than /29 on the initial alloc, as they are not restricted by the hd-ratio rule". My position on this is "if you don't like the hd-ratio rule, submit a proposition regarding that policy, and we will be glad to discuss it". Therefore, I would want to see the initial allocation policy changed to allow /29 without justification, but i would not want to see loopholes allowing users that already have a /32 to get more than /29 without being subjected to the hd-ratio policy. I hope that makes it clear where I stand.