14 Dec
2005
14 Dec
'05
1:22 p.m.
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 08:02:41PM +0100, Roger Jorgensen wrote:
quite sure there was a discussion about this some months back and most people could agree on that a /56, maybe even /52 was a better size than /48. But maybe it was on ipv6-wg@ripe.net ?
I guess you mean this: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-00.... Tim