5 Apr
2005
5 Apr
'05
2:31 p.m.
On 4-apr-05, at 15:48, Gert Doering wrote:
I don't think I agree here. So, 1-man consulting companies, providing web hosting for one customer could fulfill the criteria for a /32?
If that enterprise is willing to pay RIPE fees for it, it would qualify.
Looks like every enterprise out there would also get a /32.
If they are willing to undergo the necessary paperwork, and pay the yearly fees, yes.
Either having very many people get /32s is harmful, or it isn't. How does paying the RIPE fee move this from "harmful" to "non-harmful"?
So, I'm opposed to the policy change.
Me too.