Hi, Gert Doering schrieb:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 04:14:47PM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
I wouldn't recommend advertising more specifics to anyone... and again, I consider that a feature :-)
Well, the combination of "no PI", "no working non-PI/BGP-multihoming solution" and "PA+BGP multihoming not working either" is certainly not something that makes currently-multihomed customers want to move to IPv6...
so, let's switch to discussing http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-01.html :-) P.S.: The question is, if any Prefix longer than /32 makes any sense at all after years of propagating "/32 and shorter only!!!" - you can't force anyone to undo his filter descisions, let alone fix orphaned IPv6 setups (similar to the good old IPv4-IANA-reserverd-space-filter problematic). -- ======================================================================== = Sascha Lenz SLZ-RIPE slz@baycix.de = = Network Operations = = BayCIX GmbH, Landshut * PGP public Key on demand * = ========================================================================