Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"

I dimly remember that it was *you* that argued very much in favour of "give /48s to every end site

not exactly. i argued against it within the ivtf; thinking it was a bit short. and i was also against assigning /48s to dialu-ups. but when i presented the ivtf position, i presented the ivtf position, not my personal opinion.

"A networks are too big" doesn't really hold - if anything, /32s are too small.

might it not depend on the size of the network? that is a lesson we learned in cidr back in the early '90s. how many times do we need to learn it? randy