12 Dec
2011
12 Dec
'11
10:25 a.m.
On 12/12/11 10:03 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
So you are effectively saying, that we are constraining the IPv6 address distribution because of "man in a carriage"?
horseshit
he is saying that we have long experience of what causes routing table bloat and that we are about to repeat a mistake we made once already.
I agree, that not distributing the IPv6 space can prevent routing table bloat, but is this really the right way? can't we deal with that in any other way other than delaying IPv6 adoption? Cheers, Jan