Hi Gert, AP-WG Gert Doering wrote:
Dear Working Group,
as you might have noticed, this proposal is nicknamed "the icelandic saga" because it goes on and on and on and on...
We'd really like to bring this to conclusion, and for that, we need *feedback from the community*. So please let us know:
- this is what you want to see implemented
in principle, yes
- you're in favour of the general principle, but this specific wording is not what you want
exactly, in particular I am pretty unhappy to be asked to agree to a policy, because the NCC is - at the moment - feeling like having no policy mandate. But, at the same time, some quite important stuff is left to the CPS. My feeling is that that doesn't match. [...] I have sumbitted some suggestions and questions after the Rome meeting, based on the discussions there, (please see attachement) which do not seem to be reflected in the new version or being taken into account in the text.
thanks,
Gert Doering APWG chair
So, to sum it up, I do not oppose the idea or the proposal, but I think it is not good enough yet to become policy. If we can't do better, I'd prefer to continue on the basis of the provisional(?) CPS for now. Best regards, Wilfried.