Michael, On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 09:34:36AM -0000, michael.dillon@bt.com wrote:
The policy proposal that we are discussing, wants to make a fundamental change to the character of IP addresses. I think it is a good idea for the whole community, not just the board, to get some expert legal input into the decision making process. As long as IP addresses are not property, we can regulate them strictly and arbitrarily. But if the character of the addresses becomes more property-like, by allowing them to be traded, does this create more limits on what RIPE can do in its policy?
As far as I can see, we need expert legal advice to find out the answers to such questions.
I disagree. In fact, I can already predict what the lawyers will say: - We're not sure, because this is all new. - But be scared - very scared! - And you definitely need more lawyers. So, I suggest we should NOT worry about whether or not IP addresses are property, but rather adopt policies that allow ISPs and other LIRs to get on with the business of running the Internet. As I said before, I support the proposal. :) -- Shane