Hi Gert & all, Gert Doering schrieb:
Dear address policy WG,
one of our policy proposals (2009-08, IPv6 PI assignments for LIRs) has reached the end of the "last call" phase, and is now being discussed among the chairs of all working groups to decide whether the RIPE policy process has been properly followed, and whether consensus has been reached. [...]
We, as the WG chairs, think that the change proposed is useful to have a more workable policy for "real world" networks. Thus we have decided to move forward, even if the amount of participation was a bit low.
If i didn't say that already: I do support the proposal :-)
In general, we really need to see a few more voices in the various phases - otherwise it's really hard to claim consensus. (Which means that we, as the WG chairs, will have to be a bit more proactive in getting responses out of YOU...).
My personal problem here is, that i actually do not always recall IF and WHAT i did comment on WHICH proposal and what phase of the PDP that was again. Call it bad Mail(linglist)-Archiv handling or getting old and forgetting things. Can't we have a nifty little Web 2.1 Tool on a RIPE webpage to track pros and cons and on a proposal with checkboxes to support it or not? :-) ... oh my god, am i turning into a manager? brrrr (Sounds funny, but that's the TRUE reason i probably miss raising my voice to several proposals.. i don't always have time to immediately reply and then i forget it, or i don't want to interrupt an ongoing rant about a proposal and wait until things cool off and then forget to answer and so on... is it only me? probably so *sigh* ) -- ======================================================================== = Sascha Lenz SLZ-RIPE slz@baycix.de = = Network Design & Operations = = BayCIX GmbH, Landshut * PGP public Key on demand * = ========================================================================