It's was just a logical chain. Prerequisite is "having multiple /22 in LIR is abusing". In my opinion members that open multiple LIR's and sell received /22's are not abusers and RIPE NCC is not abuser. But if anybody says "<name> abuses policies" that man have to declare "RIPE NCC is also abusing policies". 23.04.2015, 16:49, "Opteamax GmbH" <ripe@opteamax.de>:
On 23.04.2015 15:39, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
If we suppose having multiple /22 per LIR is abusing then main "abuser" is RIPE NCC since RIPE NCC makes transfers and LIR merging allowing to receive second /22 etc. So you agree my initial reply that actually the change does not go far enough, it'd be better to completely prohibited selling IP (v4) and instead enforce withdrawing of not announced IP-Space aand returning it into the pool?
That way I am pretty sure we could quickly loosen the current /8 policy and return to a policy allowing requests of more then one /22 if need is shown .... and need may NOT be selling, but that'd be forbidden anyway then ;)
BR Jens
-- Opteamax GmbH - RIPE-Team Jens Ott
Opteamax GmbH
Simrockstr. 4b 53619 Rheinbreitbach
Tel.: +49 2224 969500 Fax: +49 2224 97691059 Email: jo@opteamax.de
HRB: 23144, Amtsgericht Montabaur Umsatzsteuer-ID.: DE264133989
-- With best regards, Vladimir Andreev General director, QuickSoft LLC Tel: +7 903 1750503