I agree. I would like to see the current proposal 2.0 of 2019-05 implemented rather sooner than later. We shouldn't rely on the projected date of IPv4 depletion. I'd prefer to have a separate proposal on the lower boundary of allocation. This would allow for a broader discussion on how to handle the trade-off between size of allocation and renumbering. Matthias -- Dr.-Ing. Matthias Wichtlhuber Researcher ------------------------------ DE-CIX Management GmbH Lindleystr. 12, 60314 Frankfurt (Germany) phone: +49 69 1730902 mobile: +49 171 3836036 fax: +49 69 4056 2716 e-mail: matthias.wichtlhuber@de-cix.net web: www.de-cix.net ------------------------------ DE-CIX Management GmbH Executive Directors: Harald A. Summa and Sebastian Seifert Trade registry: District court (Amtsgericht) Cologne, HRB 51135 Registered office: Lichtstr. 43i, 50825 Cologne ________________________________________ Von: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net> im Auftrag von Wolfgang Tremmel <wolfgang.tremmel@de-cix.net> Gesendet: Freitag, 9. August 2019 15:17 An: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Betreff: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs) ...and because of that I am happy with version 2.0 of 2019-05 as it is written. Wolfgang
On 9. Aug 2019, at 14:41, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Also, you are certainly all aware that if we do another version of this proposal with changes and a new impact analysis, we'll have run out of IPv4 before this can be implemented (thus: no extra address space for IXPs).
-- Wolfgang Tremmel Phone +49 69 1730902 0 | wolfgang.tremmel@de-cix.net Executive Directors: Harald A. Summa and Sebastian Seifert | Trade Registry: AG Cologne, HRB 51135 DE-CIX Management GmbH | Lindleystrasse 12 | 60314 Frankfurt am Main | Germany | www.de-cix.net