4 Feb
2019
4 Feb
'19
2:28 p.m.
Hi Raymond,
To make it more clear what I mean, a /24 will not be enough to connect a say /29 IPv6 to the v4 world, a /22 ( or any range of addresses up to a /22 in size ) is not enough either. Therefore I support the current policy, and am against the new proposal.
Can you please explain how you see that? This proposal only deals with the situation *after* the current policy becomes useless... Cheers, Sander