On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 6:10 PM, McTim <dogwallah@gmail.com> wrote:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2013-August/008155....
I note that you neglected to respond to this message even
I had thought I had, maybe not.
No offense, but I see a certain recurring pattern in the discussion about 2013-03.
I don't think the chair has the prerogative to close a topic.
http://ripe61.ripe.net/presentations/183-apwg-r61-steering-slides.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rough_consensus http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-resnick-on-consensus-00 - section 3 Quite frankly, from my POV, the chairs have been extremely accommodating up to now. If anything, this shows how much they value these principles above and beyond what would be required of them. As per Tore's suggestion, please take this off-list. Richard