Re: [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"

On 15 Nov 2011, at 12:16, Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie> wrote:

Here's what it would require:

-- Foo ISP is requesting a /29 because it intends to deploy 6rd. --

Are you genuinely saying that it's too much work to put this into an application form?

Seems pretty sensible and practical. Tim