On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no> wrote:
However, this is not written down in the resulting policy (it refers only generally to "non-approved transfers"), and there are some other theoretical reasons why a transfer may fail apart from need evaluation, e.g., procedural violations such as attempts to transfer PI space or de-aggregate beyond the minimum allocation size.
Unless there is a valid reason to know of those other failed attempts, there's no harm in removing it. On the other hand, it may be interesting to see a potential sharp increase of failed attempts for whatever reason and a statement of "nothing got rejected either way" may be interesting to some. But not that interesting to force this statistic by means of policy. All in all, I think it's better to weak remove unless someone comes up with a compelling reason. Richard