22 May
2012
22 May
'12
3:43 p.m.
On 22 May 2012 14:33, Pascal Gloor <pascal.gloor@finecom.ch> wrote:
Why not just use IPv6...
Using IPv6 does not remove the need of v4, you know that. Plus, my proposal is not about using more v4, but just about keeping the same number of v4 and being able to change ISP. Transforming the PA into PI and allowing the transfer could also be a solution but I don't like it due to possible massive deaggregation.
Really, isn't CATV a closed access network that you have control off? Could you do 6to4 (or something similar) at the border if you need to access v4 content? Or have I misunderstood what you are doing? J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476