16 Jan
2018
16 Jan
'18
12:22 p.m.
On 16 Jan 2018, at 11:11, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net> wrote:
That's because I don't think that "rough consensus" is primarily about how many supporters a proposal has, I think it's about primarily about the nature and quality of the objection.
Indeed. And how those objections were considered/addressed/resolved.
this can only be a discussion of principles and norms, it can never be turned into a rigid set of rules. This model will always rest heavily on the judgment of the Chairs. I'm OK with that.
Me too.