Re: [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Mailing List Account wrote:

One question though, if the minimum (sub-)/allocation size is now /24, is the part regarding classless reverse delegation in the impact statement now obsolete?

Never mind, that is in the current policy text. Oh, for proper diffs. rgds, Sascha Luck