On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 19:28 +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 25-feb-05, at 19:14, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
Also for the folks complaining about rootservers getting a /32 and those not being available to ccTLD servers, why don't you move to the APNIC region, there even the .jp root has a /32....
Well, in JP you also have to get your addresses from a NIR and you will have a local whoisdb in Japaneese...etc...it's a different model entirely.
How is it different if this japanese /32 is in my routing tables?
Just setup shop in Japan and experience it yourself ;)
I'm getting pretty tired of this IP business. Maybe I should do something easy for a living, like breeding flying pigs.
Oeh neat, as long as you attach them to a strong enough wire and don't let them drop their droplets in my backyard ;) On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 13:12 -0500, Nils Ketelsen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:00:27PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Also for the folks complaining about rootservers getting a /32 and those not being available to ccTLD servers, why don't you move to the APNIC region, there even the .jp root has a /32....
And now the next question: If a ccTLD NS gets a /32, why shouldn't a Authoratitative NS for a real big number of Domains (of a domain hoster, for example) get a /32? What is the difference between a ccTLD Nameserver and any other authoritative NS?
Let me see, in the current RIPE allocation list*, there is a school at 2001:4b20::/32 consisting of basically two buildings, there is a registrar at 2001:4b98::/32, who do not do hosting I guess. And there are a really large number of "ISP's" who really do not have more than 2 19" racks worth of equipment. I really wonder why people are complaining that they can't get a prefix. Really, if you are not able to become LIR, and get a prefix, while they quite apparently can, then you should simply quit change your job IMHO. Greets, Jeroen *, see http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/tla/ripe/